Sciencey Fiction: Is FTL Travel Even Worth Putting In Stories?

Image courtesy of Stockvault.

Okay, so whether it’s warp drives, hyperdrives, wormholes, or any other sort of engine, science fiction used to be dominated by ships that hurled people in faster than light (FTL) travel. Stories sometimes didn’t even really care how it got done, focusing more on the pure whimsy of going from planet to planet on a never-ending odyssey. A really good short example of what I’m talking about is the Spaceman Spiff stories in the old Calvin & Hobbes comics. Nowadays, it’s hard to find that carefree travel kind of story.

Part of it is for good reason: the laws of physics currently don’t allow for FTL travel. The short dirty reason I’ve always been told is that it takes an infinite amount of energy to just get to the speed of light. Science fiction needs to have some amount of science integral to the story, and breaking the laws of physics feels like cheating. Moreover, lacking good science in a science fiction story can quickly turn something into fantasy rather than sci-fi.

But I also see a loss here. Sometimes (like in Star Trek) the story just makes an assumption that humanity will eventually increase its body of knowledge to the point of using new discoveries to tackle current impossibilities. There is a kernel of hope in some brands of science fiction that looks forward to the future with eagerness and not hostility or cynicism. FTL travel can signify that in a way that almost went without saying. It admits that physics are still physics, but people can overcome any problem through using knowledge.

Does this mean that FTL travel is a relic of an idealistic past, or is it something worth keeping around? As a fan of the genre, I think that it depends on the story being told. FTL travel shouldn’t be a crutch to excuse bad science or to gratuitously throw a story into the sci-fi genre. It should be used almost as a literary device, a way to paint a story with an optimistic tone.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Sciencey Fiction: Is FTL Travel Even Worth Putting In Stories?

    • From my limited recollection, I think that traveling even close to the speed of light might dilate time, so that it would pass more quickly on Earth than in a spaceship going near the speed of light. This was used in stories like Planet of the Apes. Going backwards in time isn’t really possible according to anything I’m aware of, so going back in time is a bit of a black box.

      One thing I did think was interesting was a story which explained that going back in time also required changes in space as well. For example, the Earth isn’t in the same spot in 2017 as it was a year, a day, or even a minute ago. So if you wanted to do backwards time travel, you’ll need to account for that (magic works for fantasy, but science would require a singularity drive or a wormhole probably).

      Liked by 1 person

    • Without FTL, then travel would be like 2001, slow and realistic. Everything in a two hour movie would take place between earth and the moon. I like how they talk on cell phones at light speed.

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s